logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.06.12 2012고단4523
업무상배임
Text

1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

(b)Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who enters the victim (ju) H located in the Busan Metropolitan City GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG building in around March 18, 201 to report the design drawings produced by the service company as an agent in charge of public services and to gather model hybrid estimates or to adjust data, and has withdrawn on May 31, 201.

Defendant

B A is a victim (ju) H located in the Housing Exhibition Center in Busan Metropolitan City, a person who entered the office around February 22, 2011 and supervised the management and supervision of the duties and duties performed by Defendant A as a deputy head in charge of official duties, and retired on May 31, 201.

Defendant

C is the representative director of Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (ju) J. 205, and around December 27, 2010, a person who has 30% of the shares by entering into a business investment contract with the victim (ju) H and the G building "G building".

Defendants have a duty to divulge the trade secret data of the victim (H) to another person without permission, or to use the trade secret data for any purpose other than business or to take them out of the company.

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed in violation of their occupational duties, despite the existence of the aforementioned occupational duties, did not comply with the victim’s (ju)’s request from an external company to use the trade secret data contained in the interior map, schep business data, dosages, estimates, etc., and attempted to use them at the time of departure or retirement. Defendant C instructed Defendant A to build the external hump and store the above trade secret data. Defendant B, a subordinate employee of the Ministry of Public Affairs and Vice Minister, knew Defendant A’s leakage of the above trade secret data under the direction of Defendant C, and Defendant A conspired to store the said trade secret data in the external hump upon the direction of Defendant C.

Defendant

A according to the above public offering, from April 20, 201 to April 15, 201.

arrow