logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원속초지원 2015.12.22 2014가단10771
계금반환 청구의 소
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is fully paid KRW 53,700,000 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its payment from December 22, 2015.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Determination on each of the main claims and counterclaims

A. On February 9, 2013, the Plaintiff’s ground for the principal lawsuit against the number system as of February 9, 2013 is determined as to the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim. The summary of the Plaintiff’s claim is the number system of February 9, 2013, organized by the Defendant, the proprietor, (hereinafter “the number system of September”).

(2) Around August 2013, the Defendant subscribed to 14,00,000 won in total, up to 14,000,000 won in total, up to 14,000 won in the amount of seven installments. However, around November 12, 2013, the Defendant arbitrarily sold the said amount to the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Defendant has the obligation to return KRW 14,00,000 to the Plaintiff. 2) The Defendant’s payment of the number limit on the nine-day filing date to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant’s payment of the said number limit was either KRW 2,00,000,000 in total, or KRW 2,00,000 in the Defendant’s payment of the said number limit on the nine-year filing date, and the fact that the Defendant did not have any dispute over the said amount of KRW 13,00,000 in the aggregate between the parties’ respective arguments and the said amount of KRW 20,013.

Therefore, according to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to return the above 10,000,000 won to the plaintiff, unless there are special circumstances.

The plaintiff asserts that he paid a sum of KRW 4,000,000 in the name of C to the defendant, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

(E) According to the statement of No. 11, C is only a fact that C transferred KRW 5,00,000 to the Defendant on July 8, 2013, and did not conclude that it paid a deposit on behalf of the Plaintiff, while transferring KRW 5,00,000.

1) The Plaintiff’s main claim grounds for the main claim against the No. 20 of July 20, 2011 are determined as follows: (i) the main claim grounds for the Plaintiff’s claim are determined as follows: (ii) the main claim grounds for the Plaintiff’s claim are July 20, 201, organized by the Defendant, the proprietor, and (iii) the number limitation (hereinafter

No 17 (including a leader) was admitted to a single unit, and on April 20, 2013, it was a series of accounts to receive a bounty.

However, the defendant on April 22, 2013. 35.

arrow