1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "Defendant He Co., Ltd." was used as "A Co., Ltd."; "Defendant Heung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd." was used as "PY Co., Ltd."; and "the Defendant Heung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd." was added to the evidence of No. 7 of the judgment of the court of the first instance, which added the results of inquiry into EPP, a vehicle technology corporation, and subsequent to the third part of the first instance judgment, "................. are supplied at all times on the vehicle even if the vehicle turns out the vehicle, there is a possibility of a fire in most of the electrical factors in the vehicle." Since the vehicle turns out at the engine room during the driving of the vehicle or immediately after the driving of the vehicle, it cannot be seen that there is a possibility that the fire might be spread immediately after the outbreak of flame due to the small weather, or that the fire might not be seen to have been spread after the lapse of the 130th judgment.

2. In conclusion, the first instance judgment is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.