The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around February 2013, the summary of the facts charged: (a) at the office of the Defendant’s office located in Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant provided that “The E and F forest of this case (the forest of this case) was KRW 300 million and invested and developed in 200 million,” and (b) the victim provided that “the Defendant would purchase the forest of this case only by bearing half of the land value as it has no capacity to raise funds; and (c) the Defendant and the victim agreed to purchase the forest of this case by bearing half of the purchase price of the forest of this case, and the Defendant issued a sales contract stating that the purchase price was KRW 300 million to purchase the forest of this case.”

However, in fact, the actual sales contract between the seller and the seller for the forest of this case was not KRW 30 million but KRW 130 million.

From February 26, 2013 to March 28, 2013, the Defendant deceptioned the victim and caused the victim to do so, and the Defendant’s account under the name of the Defendant’s leakage or G or H, the representative of the seller of the instant forest land, as follows: (a) the written indictment in which the sum total of KRW 146 million is KRW 156 million is stated in the sum of the amount acquired, but the amount remitted is clearly written in writing as KRW 146 million, but the sum of the remitted amounts is KRW 146 million.

of this case, the money was remitted and acquired by fraud.

On February 26, 2013, the remittance amount of a lump-sum deposit account (limited to KRW 1,000) 1: G I Bank, J 1,500, H K Bank, L 4,003 March 18, 2013, G I Bank, J 1,000, April 21, 2013, HK Bank, L 4,8005 March 21, 2013, HK Bank, L 2,7006, 2,7006 on March 25, 2013, stated that the indictment was remitted to KRW 600,000 on March 25, 2013; however, considering the details of the financial transaction in the name of G I Bank, it appears that the deposit was made in KRW 600,000 on March 28, 2013, as above, as amended.

On the other hand, it is reasonable to view that the details of such financial transactions are included in the deposit amount of KRW 10 million on March 28, 2013, but are not included in the subject of prosecution.