A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2011, the Defendant filed a complaint against D on July 21, 201, in the process of dispute as D and trial costs in the Nam-gu Seoul Southern-gu C swimming pool, and the Defendant was indicted as assaulting D on the left side of D due to the fact that driving away D while driving away from the place was inflicted an injury on D with the damaged parts of D’s back shoulder and necks, which are equipment for swimming. After that, the Defendant filed a complaint against D as assaulting D, the instant complaint was separately prosecuted, but the judgment was consolidated.

At around 14:00 on January 13, 2012, the Defendant appeared as a witness of this court in the court No. 302 of this Court, and was given a notice of the right to refuse to testify and testified.

Although the defendant inflicted an injury upon the original d, the prosecutor asked that "I will not have the original d't have the original d', which was cited in the passage of the corridor", and asked the prosecutor questions "I will not have the original d'," and asked the prosecutor questions "I will not have the original d't have the original d't have the original d'," and "I will not have the original d't have the original d't have the original d'."

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A copy of the protocol of examination of witness (part of the protocol of second trial) (24 pages of investigation records);

1. A copy (55 pages of investigation records), photograph (73 pages), or copy of a medical record (75 pages of investigation records);

1. A medical opinion (21 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of each of the court rulings (197 pages, 228 pages), and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 152 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The defendant's defense counsel's assertion of defense counsel under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (in consideration of favorable circumstances among the reasons for both types of punishment) is denied, but the defendant was present as a witness in a criminal case against D, even though he/she denied the facts charged.