logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.24 2017나14489
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. On December 19, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for the payment order with the Suwon District Court 2016 tea3425 against the Defendant on December 19, 2016. ② The Plaintiff revised the Defendant’s domicile on January 26, 2017 to “Yansan-si Member C apartment, 615 Dong 205, 205,” which is the Defendant’s domicile on the resident registration, by serving the Defendant’s domicile as the execution officer on March 14, 2017. The above judicial assistant officer sent the original payment order and the notice of demand procedure (for obligor) to the Defendant’s address on March 14, 2017. The Plaintiff’s wife received the above notice on March 20, 2017, and the Defendant sent the notice on March 27, 2017 to the court of first instance on which he had no address on the Plaintiff’s address on the date for pleading 27, 2017.”

2. (1) Determination as to the legitimacy of the appeal for subsequent completion (1) If the original copy of the judgment was delivered lawfully by means of service by public notice, barring any special circumstance.

arrow