logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.04.03 2013고단529
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등주거침입)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[The background of criminal conduct] The victim FF Co., Ltd. was the executor of the apartment project from around 2006, and sold 1,290 households of H apartment complex, 9 (101 to 109 Dong), 710 households, 2 complex 15 Dong (201 to 215 Dong Dong), 290.

However, due to the financial shortage, etc. of the IMO Co., Ltd., the contractor of the apartment of this case, the payment of the construction price to the subcontractor has been delayed, and the buyer could have occupied approximately 1,500 households after July 2009, which was 3 months from the scheduled date of occupancy.

In the end, around 200 the number of buyers of approximately 190 households ( approximately 50 households, approximately 2 complexes, about 140 households) filed a lawsuit to refund the sale price and pay the penalty for the reason of the cancellation of the sale contract against the victim FF corporation in 2009 and won it (the final decision was made) but the actual victim FF corporation did not receive a refund of the sale price, etc.

[Public invitation for committing a crime] The Defendant, with the knowledge of the aforementioned circumstances, attempted to pressure the victim FF corporation to collect the claims of the winning buyers by using the so-called unauthorized occupancy households of the instant apartment unsold in lots, and received the fees from the winning buyers. On August 2012, 2012, the Defendant approached that he/she would receive the sale price and penalty from the J, the representative of the Suhyup Council, which is composed of approximately 140 households of the instant apartment complex 2 complex, and became the representative director by establishing KF corporation around October 2012.

The Defendant conspired with L, M, N, andO to occupy an unsold apartment unit in this case by mobilization of many people, and the Defendant instructs and supervises the overall work as the representative director of the K K corporation, and introduces persons who will occupy the unsold apartment unit, and M and N are disadvantageous to the head of the K corporation and the head of the office.

arrow