logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.11.29 2015가단104237
건물등철거
Text

1. The Intervenor A’s successor:

(a) Defendant D is a building listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2:

(b) Defendant E.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On September 30, 2014, Plaintiff A acquired the Plaintiff’s land ownership of 245 square meters in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and 248 square meters in the Republic of Korea, and on November 27, 2014, N in Yangyang-si, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, divided into O on November 21, 2014 (No. A evidence 1) and acquired ownership of 2,813 square meters in the forest (No. 1-3). Plaintiff B acquired ownership of 2,813 square meters in the forest (No. 1-3) on September 30, 2014, Plaintiff B acquired ownership of 873 square meters in the P prior to the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Qyang-si, and 205 square meters in the forest and fields on November 27, 2014.

(A) No. 1-3) Plaintiff’s successor Intervenor A (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s successor Intervenor”)

(3) On March 3, 2016, the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the entire three parcels of land owned by the Plaintiff on the ground of sale and purchase (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) from the Plaintiff on March 3, 2016, by including the said six parcels of land owned by the Plaintiff A and the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff

B. B. The Defendants’ land occupation and building ownership 1) Defendant D, E, F, H, I, J, and K are currently possessing a building constructed on the instant land from the building owners as indicated below.

A building owner’s site and site owner’s building indicated in the list No. 1 of the Plaintiff-Succession Intervenor No. 2, Nyang-si, Nyang-si, Nyang-si, Nyang-si, the building indicated in the list No. 3 of the Plaintiff-Succession Intervenor No. 4, Nyang-si, the building Defendant Eyang-si, and the building indicated in the list No. 5 of the Plaintiff-Succession Intervenor No. 5, Nyang-si, the building Plaintiff Eyang-si, the building owner’s building indicated in the list No. 7 of the Plaintiff-Succession Intervenor No. 7, the building owner’s building No. H, I, J, South-si, and the Plaintiff-Succession, the building owner of the building indicated in the list No. 8 of the Plaintiff-Succession Intervenor No. 6.

C. Accordingly, according to the conclusion, in each building listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2, Defendant E is respectively listed in the separate sheet Nos. 3, 4, and 5.

arrow