1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Defendant was awarded a contract for “Yancheon B River Sea Reclamation Works (hereinafter “the instant construction work”) from Macheon-si, and requested the Plaintiff to lease the locker on May 2, 2012.

Accordingly, as between May 2, 2012 and May 23, 2012, the Plaintiff worked in the construction site of this case for a total of 20 days, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the equipment rent of KRW 13,200,000 and the delay damages therefor.

2. 판단 살피건대, 갑 제 2 내지 5호증(가지번호 있는 것은 각 가지번호 포함, 이하 같다)의 각 기재, 증인 C의 증언에 의하면, 원고는 2012. 5. 2.경부터 2012. 5. 23.경까지 이 사건 공사 현장에 굴삭기를 투입하여 작업을 하였고, 그 장비임대료가 13,200,000원인 사실, 원고와 피고 사이에 2012. 5. 31. 위 장비임대 거래에 관하여 13,200,000원의 세금계산서가 발행된 사실, 원고를 이 사건 공사에 소개한 C은 이 사건 공사의 현장소장인 D가 피고의 대리인 명함을 가지고 있었고 현장에 피고의 현장이라는 팻말이 있었다고 증언한 사실은 인정된다.

However, each statement in Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 6 and 7 included the following circumstances, i.e., the E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "E"), from August 2, 2004 to April 12, 2006, G was each representative director of H during the period from April 12, 2006 (G and H were the shapes) (G and H were the shapes), and the defendant was awarded a contract for the instant construction work from Seocheon-si, and requested for the instant construction work to E after being awarded a contract for the instant construction work, and ② the above G was actually operating E even after its representative director was established, and ③ the Defendant is a specialized construction business entity and the Defendant was a comprehensive contractor.