The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

A. The Plaintiff entered the Army on February 25, 1952, but was discharged from military service on November 20, 1956.

B. On April 2, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant on the ground that “The Plaintiff participated in the 625 War during the military service, and from the end of 1952 to the beginning of 1953, from the time of the end of 1952 to the beginning of 1953, the Plaintiff was exposed to the total gender, sporasity, etc. during several months, thereby causing trouble in spotent and Cheongcheon-do,” resulting in a trouble in sporasium and Cheongcheon-do,” and “three parts of the three parts of the right side and the right side of the 4 parts of the ground (hereinafter “instant application”).”

C. On June 22, 2018, the Defendant rendered a non-specific decision on the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter “instant first disposition”) and a decision on the non-applicable requirements for persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant second disposition”) on the ground that “The instant application interest is not deemed to have been caused or aggravated as a causal link with combat action or other similar performance of duties, or with the performance of military duties.”

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 5, and 7 of this case was made, and the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff suffered from the aftermathy by suffering from the aftermath while performing military service in the military and resulting from long-term exposure to spora-electric noise, etc. during the military operations, or caused such noise above the natural progress speed, and "the 3rd parts of the right-hand side and right-hand side 4 parts caused by the Dong," was cut off by the plaintiff while performing military service in the area where the 20 degrees or less under the 20 degrees or less under the ethmb., the plaintiff suffered from the aftermathy by suffering from the aftermathy while performing his duty. Thus, there is a proximate causal relation between the plaintiff's application and the plaintiff's application of this case.

Therefore, the plaintiff.