1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim for confirmation of non-existence of the secured obligation is dismissed.

2. The defendant.

1. On July 30, 2007, F, as the Plaintiff’s basic facts, entered into a loan agreement with the Defendant to obtain a loan of KRW 740 million, and on July 26, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a mortgage agreement with the Defendant on July 26, 2010 with respect to the amount of debt for the said loan, as to the amount of KRW 962 million, KRW 2,674,00,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

In addition, on July 26, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a superficies contract with the Defendant on July 26, 2010 by setting the entire period and duration of the land as 30 years from July 26, 2010 and completed the registration of creation of superficies on July 29, 2010.

On July 30, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a loan agreement with the Defendant to obtain a loan of KRW 130 million from the Defendant, and entered into a mortgage agreement with the Defendant on July 26, 2010 regarding KRW 33,06 square meters of land D in Sung-si, the Plaintiff owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant two real estate”), with respect to the debtor as to the amount of KRW 169,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,

In addition, on July 26, 2010, the Plaintiff concluded a superficies contract with the Defendant on July 26, 2010 by setting the entire period and duration of the land as 30 years from July 26, 2010, and completed the registration of creation of superficies on July 29, 2010.

F) On July 30, 2010, F entered into a loan agreement with the Defendant to obtain a loan of KRW 450 million from the Defendant, and on July 26, 2010, in order to secure the said loan’s obligation, Suwon-gu E-mail (hereinafter “instant three real estate”), Suwon-gu, the Plaintiff owned on July 26, 2010, and G.