beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 100,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from March 22, 2013 to August 12, 2015, and the following:
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Fact 1) C is a vehicle B around 21:40 on March 22, 2013 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
) A driving of B, entering the entrance intersection at the entrance of the new ethal intersection in Daegu Jung-gu, into the luran-gu, and led to a large-fladr. Since it is an intersection where signal lights are installed, C shall reduce the speed and drive safely in accordance with the new eth, while having violated the signal, C shall enter the yellow fladr and drive safely in accordance with the new ethic, thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff, such as the upper part of the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was directly flad in accordance with the new ethrh in the upper part of the three-lanes of the Defendant vehicle running on the left side of the Defendant vehicle, with the upper part of the front part of the Defendant vehicle’s upper part, and caused injury to the Plaintiff, such as the upper part of the 5th left part, the ethal eth, the
(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, and 4 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.
C. As to the Defendant’s assertion of exemption, the Defendant asserts that the injury, such as the part of the left-hand slothead, the part of the dongb above, the part of the left-hand leg part, the part of the left-hand knife part, and the part of the left-hand knife knife, etc. (hereinafter “instant injury”), which the Plaintiff suffered by the instant accident, was caused by the king, and there was no causation
According to the records in Gap evidence No. 3, the results of the physical appraisal of the director of the school of the family household of this court, according to the overall purport of the pleadings, the plaintiff is in the 10th century of March 27, 2013 after the accident of this case.