A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 24, 2014, the Defendant supplied the victim C at the mutual infinite coffee shop located in the Seocho-si, Seocho-si, and provided the consumer with the “infinite to the golf product store the inside of which exceeds 50 kys nationwide,” but according to the terms and conditions of the delivery transaction partner, the Defendant transferred the delivery transaction of 25 million won to the Party.

In addition, it will guarantee the net income of KRW 60 million per year for two years, and return KRW 35 million per annum when it does not guarantee the net income of KRW 60 million per year for two years.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant had been liable for a total amount of KRW 41 million to the lending company without any particular property at the time, and was also in the situation where the business of the distribution company in operation was also poor, so even if the Defendant received the delivery of KRW 35 million from the damaged party under the name of the delivery business partner, he did not have the intent or ability to transfer the delivery transaction partner to the victim or to guarantee the net profit as agreed upon.

On March 26, 2014, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 35 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant on March 26, 2014 by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. A certificate of confirmation of delivery contracts and transaction details, and a letter of confirmation;

1. Each investigation report (including accompanying documents);

1. Recording records (the defendant and his defense counsel who made efforts for acceptance by transfer and takeover of a contract by the victim's side while the defendant made efforts for acceptance by transfer;

However, the following circumstances revealed by each of the above evidence, i.e., the defendant, who made efforts to transfer the transaction partner to the victim.

However, there is no fact that the victim visited the victim directly with the victim and introduced the person in charge, and there is no fact that the victim separately arranged the name and contact information of the person in charge of the customer, and if there is no fact, the victim is the victim as alleged by the defendant.