logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.06.15 2015가단16132
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The purport and judgment of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that Defendant B is the owner of the F cafeteria building located in Pakistan-si, Pakistan-si, and Defendant C and D are the former lessee. Although the above building was removed as an illegal building, the Defendants had the Plaintiff enter into a contract with the Plaintiff to succeed to the lessee under the lease agreement of the Defendant C and D around January 2014. As a result, the Plaintiff paid KRW 14,000,000 to the Defendant C and D for the right of lease succession, and transferred the rent of KRW 2,00,000 to the Defendant B in return for the right of lease succession. Other property damage and mental damage, such as interior expenses, restaurant collection and tool purchase cost, miscellaneous expenses, miscellaneous expenses, expenses, expenses, and amount of damages, etc., the Defendants are obligated to claim compensation for damages arising from joint tort.

Therefore, it is not sufficient to recognize that the entries in the evidence Nos. 1 through 8 alone are the illegal building in the E-cafeteria located in Pakistan-si, and the Defendants are the Plaintiff, which belongs to the fact that the above building was an illegal building, and that the Plaintiff had the Plaintiff enter into a contract by succeeding to the status of the lessee under the Defendant C and D’s lease agreement around January 2014, and there is no other evidence.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow