1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the Crossing-gun B forest, C forest and D forest in Gangwon-do.

(hereinafter referred to as “B forest, etc.”). B.

On February 19, 2009, the plaintiff filed a civil petition that the occupation and use part of the road E, which belongs to the Crossing-gun, invaded the boundary of B forest land owned by the plaintiff, and requested the boundary restoration surveying to the branch office of the Crossing-gun in Gangwon-do Headquarters of the Korea Cadastral Corporation, and on April 15, 2009, the cadastral corporation notified the purport that the boundary restoration surveying cannot be conducted until the boundary of the forestry map and the cadastral map overlap with each of the boundary of the cadastral map and the cadastral map as a result of the on-site verification on March 19, 2009.

C. On July 21, 2009, the Crossing-gun requested the Plaintiff to “if there was any error in the registered matters in the cadastral record during the cadastral surveying process of B or C forest land, and thus, to cooperate in the correction of the boundary,” but on February 19, 2010, the Crossing-gun notified the Plaintiff that “In accordance with the current Act on Land Survey, Waterway Survey and Cadastral Records (the “Act on the Construction, Management, etc. of Spatial Data”), the registration of land in the forestry register (1/600) and the registration land for the land cadastre (1/1200), including the three parcels owned by the Plaintiff, are registered for a total of 12 parcels (1/1200) that overlap with the boundary between the land registered in the other drawing and the land registered in the land cadastre (1/1200).”

On December 16, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition for ex officio registration of the land subject to correction of registered matters. On December 28, 2010, the Crossing-gun reviewed the appropriateness of registration “the Plaintiff on December 28, 2010,” which did not clearly notify the Plaintiff of the reason for filing an application for correction without preparing a survey result for correction of registered matters, and the land, the registered matters (security) of which is not corrected.