Defendant

The imprisonment with prison labor for A shall be eight months, and the imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant B shall be six months, and the imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant C.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C is the owner of the entertainment drinking house E in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and the defendant A is the head of the business office who employs and manages female employees, and the defendant B is the head of the business office who conducts affairs such as public relations, customer guidance, ice and calculation.

Defendants jointly operated the above main points from October 15, 2018 to May 9, 2019. A half of the main points’ profit was to be acquired by Defendant C, Defendant A, and Defendant B, respectively.

The Defendants employed female employees whose names including F, G, H, etc. are not known during the above period, let the said employees find the place to have sexual intercourse with them, and then, in the case of sexual intercourse in the open space of the main place, 110,000 won per hour, and in the case of sexual intercourse, 210,000 won per hour, and distributed 10,000 won to female employees after receiving 2,10,000 won per hour, and the remaining 10,000 won was acquired as acquired by the Defendant for sexual intercourse as set forth in the following additional collection by Defendant A.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and B;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against F, I, G, H, and J;

1. Each statement K and L;

1. Photographs of business books;

1. Determination as to the assertion of Defendant C and defense counsel in each seizure protocol

1. The summary of the argument is that Defendant C was not aware of, or was aware of, the brokerage of sexual traffic, but did not invite anyone to commit the crime of sexual traffic brokerage.

2. In the case of co-offenders who act in collusion with more than two legal principles, the conspiracy does not require any legal penalty, but is sufficient if there is an implied communication on the joint commission of the crime directly or indirectly between the accomplices, and even if there is no direct evidence, it can be recognized by the circumstantial facts and empirical rules.