logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.10.16 2014고단2611
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 3, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of 1.5 million won by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on February 3, 2009, a summary order of 3 million won by a fine at the Ulsan District Court on April 26, 2010, and a person who received a summary order of 5 million won by the Ulsan District Court on June 14, 2013 for the same crime.

1. On August 13, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) on two or more occasions, and operated a motor vehicle at a distance of about four km from the same day to the parking lot of the 4km apartment in the Si-Eup-Myeon in the same city at approximately 05:50 on the roads in front of the mountain basin located in 475-1, Chungcheongnam-si, Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si without a driving license, while under the influence of alcohol at least 0.129%, without a driving license.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (D) is a person engaging in driving service of a certain amount of automobiles.

On August 13, 2014, at around 05:50 on August 13, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license, and led the Defendant to drive it at a speed of about 5 km per hour at the front parking lot of the 105-Dong-dong apartment located in the water-Eup in Yangsan-si.

At the same time, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving a motor vehicle by making it possible for a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle to live well after the passage of the motor vehicle, as a parking lot in an apartment complex.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim to go beyond the ground by taking the left side of the victim E (the age of 63) who passed away with the back of the car driven by the defendant due to negligence.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant suffered kneee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee, etc., by occupational negligence,

arrow