Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 334,768,662 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 62,293,398 to Plaintiff B, and each of them.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
(a) The following facts are found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the statements in Gap evidence 1-1-2, Gap evidence 2-2, Eul evidence 1-4, 7, 8, 12, 13-2, Eul evidence 3, witness E's testimony and the whole purport of the arguments.
1) Defendant D and Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) engaging in electrical construction business under the trade name “F”.
The “G Corporation” (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation”) is called the instant construction project.
2) On November 10, 2016, the Plaintiff jointly received the supply and demand (the supply and demand ratio Defendant Company: 51%, Defendant D 49%). 2) The Plaintiff, as an employee of F, was engaged in the work of attaching electric wires on the H2 floor, which is located at the site of the instant construction site, without wearing safety equipment, such as a cut-off on November 10, 2016, in which part of the Plaintiff’s body was flicked by having the flow of high voltage current, and suffered pictures by contacting the fire that occurred from the power wave.
Plaintiff
B as an employee of Non-Party I Co., Ltd., sought to discover and seek to go with the Plaintiff, which was cut off as above, and suffered images, etc.
(3) The Defendant Company: (a) had Nonparty J, a worker of the instant construction, assist Nonparty J in safety management as a safety manager; (b) at the time of the instant accident, J did not take any measures to prevent particular accidents; (c) was convicted of the injury caused by occupational negligence (including June of the instant accident and two years of suspended execution, etc.) due to the fact of the injury inflicted on the Plaintiffs due to such occupational negligence; (d) Defendant D also had Nonparty K, a worker of the instant construction, assist the safety management of J as the on-site agent of the instant construction; and (e) at the time of the instant accident, K had the Plaintiff work as seen earlier without taking any measures to block electricity.
5. The Busan Urban Transportation Corporation and the Defendants, which are the place where the instant construction is ordered.