logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.11.23 2018고합362
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence 1 to 7 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On November 29, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at Suwon District Court on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for the same crime at the Seoul Northern District Court on May 22, 2007. On February 9, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for the same crime at the Daejeon High Court’s Cheongju Branch, which was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for the same crime at the Daejeon High Court on February 9, 2012. On May 25, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a habitual special larceny at the Daejeon District Court on August 9, 2017, and was sentenced to two or more years of imprisonment for a habitual larceny, etc.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant, at around 02:40 on July 9, 2018, intrudes into a D cafeteria operated by the injured party C on July 9, 2018, and takes up KRW 300,000 in cash, which was located in the Kacter’s depository located therein.

In other words, the property owned by the victim was stolen habitually.

2. The defendant intrudes into the rear window of the F fishing point operated by the victim E at the same building as described in paragraph (1) at around 03:31 on the same day as described in paragraph (1), and was in the carper.

approximately KRW 340,000 in cash by entering two safes;

In other words, the property owned by the victim was stolen habitually.

3. On July 10, 2018, the Defendant shall take up KRW 250,000,00 in cash, which was affected by the victim H in J on July 10, 2018, into the Kabter’s treasury following the Kafle run by the victim H in G.

In addition, the market price of the victim's ownership was the victim's CCTV saw one, and the victim's property was stolen habitually.

4. On the same day as described in paragraph (3), the Defendant intruded with the victim K in J of J of J of J of J of J of J of J of J of J of J of J of J of J of J of J of J of 04:00 won in cash, which was in the Kitter’s depository.

In other words, the property owned by the victim was stolen habitually.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E, C, H, and K;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Each report on occurrence (thief), each on-site photograph, respectively.

arrow