logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2020.01.16 2019고단1709
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury to Dangerous Driving) is a person engaging in driving a Bsch Rexton car.

On June 14, 2019, at around 22:25, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.114% without a driver’s license, and neglected to drive the three-lane road of the front side of Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City from the Kim Sea to the parallel basin, due to negligence, such as an electric router, etc., and proceeded without discovering the Estuna car of the victim D (ma, 67 years old) who is under the atmosphere of the traffic signal at time and without discovering the said string part of the said strawton car.

As a result, the Defendant, while driving a car in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bell that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) were driven by the Defendant from a knife restaurant with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.114% under the influence of alcohol without a vehicle driving license as stated in paragraph (1) to the front day of Gangseo-gu in Busan Metropolitan City without a vehicle driving license.

3. The Defendant: (a) called out to the scene by the staff G of the Busan Gangseo Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report of a traffic accident at the time and place specified in Paragraph (1); and (b) confirmed that the Defendant was locked in the vehicle in the foregoing condition while smelling; and (c) confirmed whether the Defendant was drinking or not; and (d) assaulted the police officer by taking a bath to the police officer, while taking a bath for the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning traffic accident handling and crackdown on drinking driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A traffic accident statement;

arrow