beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. On October 8, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that: (a) by the Defendant’s assault, the Plaintiff undergone an operation due to an excessive snow in the left-hand eye; and (b) thereafter, entered into a permanent disability due to a serious phenomenon in the left-hand eye; and (c) accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim for the following amount as compensation for damages.
(1) Medical expenses of KRW 1,300,200 (= KRW 64,0310 for hospital treatment expenses of KRW 659,890 for hospital treatment expenses) (2) With daily income of KRW 5,806,584 for 42 days from October 13, 2015 to November 23, 2015 (=138,252 won x 42 days x 42 days) and for some claims from November 24, 2015 to August 31, 2016.
2. In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the Defendant received a fine of KRW 1,500,000 on June 8, 2016 from the following facts: (a) comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the Defendant was guilty: (b) that the Plaintiff, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s scam on October 23:40, 2015, was scambling the Plaintiff’s scams by scambling the Plaintiff’s scams on the ground of the Plaintiff’s scam on the ground of the Defendant’sless scam, and caused injury to the Plaintiff, such as an internal scambling that requires treatment for about six weeks on the left part of the Plaintiff’s right drinking
(2) The Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the tort in this case, barring any special circumstance, barring any special circumstance. The Defendant is obliged to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the tort in this case.
3. On October 22, 2015 and November 16, 2015, the defendant prepared a written agreement to the effect that he would not raise any future civil or criminal objection due to the instant tort between the plaintiff and the plaintiff. Thus, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff is not liable for damages. Accordingly, according to the written evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the plaintiff and the defendant raised a future civil or criminal objection as to the instant tort at the women's station and the Busan District Prosecutors' Office.