Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by fine for 5,00,000 won, and imprisonment for four months and fine for 4,000,000 won, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A operated a trade name “D” and “E” with five rooms in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, with five rooms, and advertised the Internet “F” and employed G as female employees.

Defendant

B introduced the acquisition of the above establishment to Defendant A, and notified Defendant A of the method of operation of the establishment after attending the above establishment from June 2014.

In collusion, Defendants conspired from June 16, 2014 to June 26, 2014, from October 16, 2014 to October 17, 2014 (Provided, That Defendants B and B received 40,000 to 45,000 won from male customers in the name of the above business place, and directed them to the room in the above business place by receiving 40,000 to 45,00 won from male customers in the name of the above business place, and then, they engaged in the business of arranging sexual traffic, etc., such as arranging sexual intercourse, by having them enter the said business place and hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of G, H, and I;

1. Each police statement to J and K;

1. Each statement of G, H and I;

1. Each photograph and account book;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to securing photographs showing documentary evidence at the time of crackdown on the site and publicity materials on Internet site business places);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of punishment (the defendants) and the concurrent imposition of a fine (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse (Defendants);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the defendants) of the suspended execution;

1. Probation and community service order (the defendants) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant A") is the business owner of the instant establishment after the first control of June 26, 2014, and the second control on October 17, 2014 and the quality of the offense is not good. Defendant B is an employee.