beta
Text
1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000;
2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who serves as the head of the E hospital and the division division in Busan-gun D.
A medical person, founder of a medical institution, or a person working for a medical institution shall not receive economic benefits provided by a medical device distributor, etc. for the purpose of adopting or inducing the use of a medical device.
around July 2012 to August 8, 2012, the Defendant received 400,000 won per unit delivery, 10% of total of 60,000,000 won per unit delivery, in return for using 15 medical expendors, which are medical expendable goods inserted into the skin when inserting air cancer drugs from G, a business operator of F E hospital, Inc., Ltd., a medical device sales business entity, in charge of the medical device sales business, from G., the Defendant received 15.0,000 won per unit delivery.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of a witness G, H, I, and J;
1. The defendant asserts that he/she does not receive 60,000 won in return for the use of the accelerator Capital.
However, he has served as F Business Member;
G consistently used 15 accelerators in return for the use of 15 accelerators, 40,000 won in total, per unit, 10% of the supply price per unit, and 60,000 won in person, to the defendant.
statement is made.
And this is also consistent with the statements of other related persons.
① In other words, during the process of receiving the transfer from G, I, a successor to G, was found to have offered rebates for the portion used in calculating 40,000 won per unit to the Defendant.
Hdo, which is the operator of F, gave to G 15,00 won in total, 40,000 won in each line of up to 10% in accordance with the proposal of G.
statement is made.
In light of the following circumstances, it is difficult to believe the above Defendant’s statement.
① In other words, the Defendant stated that it was not entirely related to the acceptance of rebates, and that he was not involved in the selection of medical devices.
Although the defendant made a statement, it was once the defendant made.