1. The Defendant shall pay 6,5260,00 won to the Plaintiff and 15% per annum from April 15, 2016 to the date of full payment.

1. The plaintiff, on August 9, 2006, ordered the defendant to convert the amount of KRW 10 million into Korean currency (the amount calculated by converting the amount of KRW 10 million into KRW 55,000,000 when delivering the People's Republic of Korea's Republic of China's Republic of China's Republic of China's 50,000 won), on November 4, 2006 (the amount agreed to be converted into Korean currency when delivering the People's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's 65,000 won), on January 1, 2007 (the amount agreed to be converted into Korean currency when delivering the People's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's Republic of Korea's 85,000 won), on January 34, 2007 (the amount of KRW 38 million among it shall be converted into KRW 91,000,00000.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 6,5260,000 won calculated by deducting 2,574,000 won from the Plaintiff’s person who received the repayment of the loan amounting to KRW 91,00,000,000, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from April 15, 2016 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the day of this judgment sought by the plaintiff.

The Defendant asserts that the amount of partial claims claimed by the Plaintiff constitutes double claims against the existing principal and interest, and that the Defendant agreed to reduce the amount of KRW 20 million, KRW 33 million, KRW 1.5 million, KRW 8 million, and KRW 1920,000, which the Plaintiff shall compensate for to the Defendant’s mother, and KRW 1.92 million, which the Defendant shall compensate to the Defendant’s mother, from each Defendant’s loan obligation. However, the evidence alone submitted by the Defendant is insufficient to acknowledge each of the above allegations by the Defendant.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.