Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle B at low price.

On February 27, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 06:45, and proceeded with the adjacent road C from the ridge to the slope of the instant road.

Since there is a road where signal, etc. is installed in the front door, in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well with the front door and the seat, and to safely drive the signal.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim D (the age of 35) who was standing a crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals on the right side of the proceeding by negligence in violation of the stop signal, and caused the victim D (the age of 35) to the front part of the above vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence for about three months, such as the complete ion of human heat outside the right snife, which requires treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on internal investigation report on the actual condition (as to the statement of a shote);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In full view of the circumstances under the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and the defendant’s age, occupation, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence of the same sentence as the order shall be imposed.

The crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance - the defendant's negligence in violation of the suspension signal, resulting in an injury to a victim who has dried the crosswalk in normal pedestrian signals, and the degree of the injury suffered by the victim is not weak and the degree of the injury suffered by the victim is not weak.