The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) has no record of assaulting police officials E, or taking a bath against such police officials.

Judgment

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① E is subject to investigation by the police, ② the Defendant fright to enter a tobacco frighten, and fright to fright the fright of the frighten and tobacco smoke, and E is not likely to interfere with the issuance of a penalty by threatening the fright face of the frighten.

Although the defendant was scamed, "I wish to kill this scam.

“I” and “I ambling E’s chest by hand

The statement, etc. (the 25th page of the evidence record) contains a significant detailed statement about the circumstances of this case, and ② according to the statement (the 41th page of the evidence record) prepared by the witness of this case, the following was considered to keep the police officer from smoking a cigarette before the patrol on the road.

“The person assaults the left shoulder and the upper part of the police.”

In full view of the following: “The content of “E” is consistent with the foregoing statement; ③ CCTV images are confirmed that the Defendant was probnating a police officer, as stated in the judgment of the court below, the Defendant took a bath for police officer E and assaulted him.

Since the defendant's assertion is sufficiently acceptable, it is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.