logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2014.08.19 2014고정148
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A fine of two million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a Poter Cargo Vehicle B as a duty.

On March 9, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, around 16:42 on March 9, 2014, proceeded with a one-lane road in front of the Pasan High School located in the Baan-gun in the Baan-gun.

At that time, the center line of yellow domin line was installed.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle shall always pass from the center line to the left-hand side in a clear spirit, and in the absence of special circumstances, he/she has a duty of care to keep the center line in the workplace.

Nevertheless, the defendant is proceeding beyond the central line on the ground that the surface is non-permanent due to road construction while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.077%.

A driver is driving in a opposite lane, and he is driving on a roadside.

At this time, the injured party C (n,52 years old) who was normally driven by the injured party C (n,52 years old) is not free from the amount of the D AW-E car, and received the front part of the damaged vehicle in front of its right side.

This defendant's negligence caused injury to E (V, 52) who was on board the damaged vehicle with the above C due to his occupational negligence in the course of performing his duties, both of which require approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

B. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving approximately 700 meters from the street in front of a restaurant in front of a restaurant where he did not know the trade name on the backside military white school, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.077% of alcohol in a temporary light, such as the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 148-2 (2) 3 of the Road Traffic Act;

arrow