The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant, as a dentist, filed a complaint or a civil petition against a tort, such as violation of the Medical Service Act by a private victim B (the age of 36) of the specific network dental hospital, and filed a complaint with the above dental hospital. As such, multiple dentists, including the Defendant, supported the victim by supporting the above behavior of the victim and raising litigation costs, but the victim did not pay the money borrowed from the Association of the Medical Center, or did not pay the money borrowed from the Association of the Medical Center. The Defendant was dissatisfied with the victim’s complaint.

On November 7, 2014, the Defendant: (a) accessed O D D D D’s work using a computer to the clinic of “E”; and (b) on the free bulletin bulletin, the Defendant refers to the victim on the bulletin board “the thickness of raising a question of language”; and (c) the Defendant’s sample that enables accurate understanding of the mental state of the pathy.

결국엔 돈 외엔 아무것도 관심없는 ㅋㅋ 대부분의 바지 치마들도 저런 생각으로 살고 있겠죠

“Publicly insulting the victim by posting the word “”.

2. Determination

(a) An offense subject to prosecution on complaint (Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act);

B. Revocation of complaint by the victim after the prosecution of this case

C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act)