A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The seized Samsung Card No. 426 of the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office, 2020.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 20, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and one year and six months of imprisonment for larceny of night buildings at the Daejeon District Court. On December 2, 2015, the Daejeon District Court sentenced the Defendant to two years of imprisonment for habitual larceny, etc. on August 11, 2017; on November 15, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for night building intrusion, larceny, etc. at the Daejeon District Court’s official residential support; and on December 8, 2019, the execution of the said sentence was completed.

【Criminal Facts】

[200 Highest 75]

1. On February 22, 2020, the Defendant violated the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) discovered the victim’s market value at the time of Daejeon Pungdong B and the “C” restaurant, which was located in Daejeon Pungdong B, as the victim’s market value at the above location was 1.5 million won, and found the victim’s market value at the victim’s location was 1.25cc c., using the key located in the Ortoba, and stolen it.

2. Around 16:30 on February 22, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) intruded the victim F, who was in E, into other community halls, the victim F, at the time of public housing.

In addition, at around 19:30 on the same day, the defendant diversed out the above community center, and 1, rice, shoulder, etc. were taken in the market price of the victim's ownership.

Accordingly, the defendant intrudes on another person's structure, and was sentenced to punishment more than three times due to larceny, etc., and stolen another's property as a repeated crime.

"200 Highest 103"

1. Around 00:30 on January 30, 2020, the Defendant found one Samsung Credit Card, which was lost by the victim I in front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu.

The defendant did not follow necessary procedures such as returning the credit card acquired as above to the victim, but did so with the defendant's thought to have.

This is the defendant.