1. The Plaintiff:

(a) As regards Defendant A, D, and E, KRW 100,000,00 for each of them, and KRW 17,590,000 for them, from March 30, 2005;

1. The Plaintiff, indicating the claim, has renounced the inheritance of the deceased H (the deceased H H’s first heir, and all the second heir died, and the third heir is the deceased’s brothers and sisters as the deceased H’s brothers and sisters), Defendant F and G Co., Ltd. for the purpose of the extension of the statute of limitations of the claim for reimbursement against the deceased H (the Busan District Court Decision 2006Gahap20682 decided on the indemnity amount).

(a) Defendant 1, 4, and 5: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (a)

B. Defendant 2, 3, and 7: Articles 208(3)2 and 150(1)(a) of the Civil Procedure Act (a) of the Civil Procedure Act merely asserted that the decision of approval of inheritance limit was obtained, and the Plaintiff accepted the above assertion and filed a claim for compensation against Defendant 2 and Defendant 3 within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased H, and Defendant 7 asserted that the principal did not have been involved in the operation of the Defendant G Co., Ltd. when the representative liquidator files an objection to the instant payment order, and that Defendant 7 asserted that the principal did not have been involved in the operation of the Defendant G Co., Ltd. and did not dispute the claim against the Defendant Co.)

(c) Defendant 6: Articles 208(3)2 and 150(1) and (3) (a) of the Civil Procedure Act (a judgment made by deeming that the case is one’s own);