logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.09.04 2015가합512
약정금 및 용역대금 청구
Text

1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to Plaintiff A for KRW 55,00,000, and KRW 20,000,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 1, 2013, Plaintiff A and the Republic of Korea agreed to participate in the business of newly constructing and selling E Lemers (hereinafter “instant Lemers”) in detail with the Defendants and the Philippines (hereinafter “instant Lemers”), and agreed as follows (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

Defendant D and Defendant C, who participate in the matters of the Red Cross Project located in ebu, shall agree with the plaintiff A to confirm the following matters:

:

1. Plaintiff A shall deposit F Coorp, an executor (hereinafter “instant company”) with the daily deposit of KRW 0,000,000 as business execution fund, and it shall be refunded in full at the time of termination of the business.

2. Of the video and 3D production service costs to be paid to the representative Plaintiff B, this0 million won shall be paid to the Dong, and the remainder of the 0 million won shall not be converted into the investment of Plaintiff A and returned.

3. The plaintiff A shall be responsible for the work management of the project and the contractor shall pay 10% of the profits accruing when the project is completed.

on June 1, 2013: Defendant D, Defendant C

B. On July 18, 2013, pursuant to the instant agreement, Plaintiff A remitted KRW 20,000,000 to the Defendant’s National Bank account. On August 9, 2013, Plaintiff A remitted KRW 25,000,000 to the Defendant’s National Bank account. On December 3, 2013, Plaintiff A paid KRW 55,00,000,000 to the Defendants, such as remitting KRW 10,00,000 to the Defendant’s bank account.

C. From April 2013 to July 2014, Plaintiff B produced and supplied the Defendants with the instant Leaker’s hub, website, video, and 3D, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as the “supply of Services in this case”). 【No dispute exists, entry in Gap’s evidence 1 through 4 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The defendants' assertion 1) The defendants' business of this case is without merit due to the defendants' lack of funds.

arrow