1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company running automobile transportation business and automobile repair business, etc., and the Plaintiffs were the employees who served as drivers of Defendant Company bus bus prior to the disciplinary action on September 2, 2016.

B. On August 30, 2016, the Defendant held a disciplinary committee with respect to the Plaintiffs on August 30, 2016, and decided to punish the Plaintiffs as of September 2, 2016 based on subparagraphs 5 and 55 of Article 61 of the Rules of Employment, and notified the Plaintiffs of this decision on September 2, 2016 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant disciplinary dismissal”).

(2) [Plaintiff A] On June 1, 2016, crew members reported the instant disciplinary dismissal on the part of a passenger using a route vehicle on the part of the passenger, as lost goods in their jurisdictional office, and embezzled the lost goods kept in their custody on June 3, 2016, by directly putting them on the person subject to disciplinary action at his/her office at around 00:30 minutes, and without permission. [Plaintiff B] around 08:54, August 3, 2016, when the passenger was on board at his/her own bus stops and embezzled the lost goods occupied by occupying them without permission at his/her jurisdictional office. 2] From the date of filing a request for retrial on September 22, 2016, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiffs’ request for retrial on the ground that he/she again stated the Plaintiffs’ request for reexamination on the grounds that he/she did not return to the company for a certain period after notifying the Plaintiffs of the disciplinary action (hereinafter “Defendant 2’s request for reexamination”).

C. The instant disciplinary action against the instant rules of employment is dismissed.