A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 6, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 27, 2011.

1. The Defendant of the 2015 Highest 1917, the Defendant, as the head of the business team of the Company D, and C, as the head of the business team of the Company D, who was willing to acquire money in the name of the deposit by iceizing the right to vicariously sell the E building.

Accordingly, around August 13, 2010, the Defendant, along with C, made a false statement to the effect that “A is the executor of the instant E building, and C is the equity right holder of the said building. Within one month, from September 2010, the Defendant purchased the entire three floors of the said building and made it possible for the Defendant to start selling the entire third floor of the said building, so a deposit would be paid 200 million won.”

However, in fact, the defendant was not the executor of the above building, but C was not the owner of the above building, and at the time the defendant purchased the above building and did not have the intent or ability to exercise the right to sell the whole third floor of the above building to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant and C, as seen above, received KRW 60 million from the victim to the corporate bank account of C immediately from the victim, and received KRW 60 million in total from the victim, and received KRW 100 million in total seven times as the sales agency deposit money on November 1, 11, and November 2, 11, respectively, with the CT Bank account (Account Number G) in the name of the Defendant, and KRW 10 million on November 3 and 11.4, respectively, and transferred KRW 10 million in total to the said account on November 8 and 23, respectively.

2. The Defendant, in collusion with H on September 4, 2008, ordered the victim J to immediately perform removal works on the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City and two parcels from October 2008, 2008, when he paid KRW 90 million to the victim J in return for the order of construction works at the office of the Defendant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, the facts are all about the above removal site.