야생생물보호및관리에관한법률위반
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
The Defendants respectively.
Punishment of the crime
In common, the Defendants jointly captured 1 Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant A’s legal statement
1. Defendant B’s partial statement
1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;
1. A report on internal investigation;
1. Investigation report (verification of suspect B's telephone conversations details and photographing them);
1. Investigation report (Analysis of details of telephone conversations among suspects);
1. Investigation report (related to the time during which the whole viewingF finds a suspect's vehicle);
1. Investigation report (related to the reproduction of field photographs);
1. Investigation report (related to attachment of guidance from the place of departure to the place of destination);
1. Suspect A telephone conversations;
1. On-site photographs and the site photographs of rash;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and investigation reports (the clothes and photographs worn at the time of the suspect B) taken after wearing the clothes at the time of hunting of the suspect A;
1. Article 69 (1) 6 and Article 19 (1) of the Act on the Protection and Management of Wild Fauna and Flora concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;
1. Defendant B who bears the cost of lawsuit: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of the main sentence of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;