Even if examining the relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, did not err by misapprehending the rules of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the "sexual abuse, such as sexual harassment, etc., committed in the crime of violating the Child Welfare Act (or sexual harassment against a child)" and the specification of the facts charged. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

Justices Kim In-bok, Counsel for defendant

Justices Park Sang-ok

Justices Park Il-san