이 사건 공탁금 출급 청구권은 원고에게 있다[국패]
The Plaintiff is entitled to claim the payment of the instant deposit.
The court held that the right to claim the withdrawal of the deposit of this case has priority over the plaintiff, who is not the defendants, due to the deposit of creditor's unrefluent deposit and the execution deposit due to concurrent seizure of the claim to return the lease deposit
Article 1 of the National Tax Collection Act
Seoul Western District Court 2018 Ghana 228595 Deposit Payment Claim
AA
BB
.01.10
oly 2019.14
1. Claim for payment of deposit money indicated in the attached list and interest thereon against the Plaintiff
confirm that such act has been committed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;
Cheong-gu Office
The same shall apply to the order.
1. Indication of claims: To be as specified in attached Form 1;
2. 가. 피고 QQ, WW: 자백간주 판결 (민사소송법 제208조 제3항 제2호)
(b) Defendant Z: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)
(c) Defendant F: Not clearly disputing the Plaintiff’s cause of the claim; provided, however, that:
Although the Defendant released the seizure of the claim for payment of deposit money, the Plaintiff paid the deposit money.
in order to file a lawsuit against the defendant, the court has the interest in the lawsuit to be subject to this judgment.
c.