beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.07.21 2015나18655

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. As a real estate licensed real estate agent, the Plaintiff is operating the “E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” in Daegu-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

B. F is co-owners of the building on G Tae-gu Daegu-gu 611.2 square meters and its ground hospital (hereinafter “instant real estate”). H, a director of the medical device company known to Pyeongtaek, requested H to sell and purchase the instant real estate.

H introduced the Defendants to F while working to sell the instant real estate.

C. On November 29, 2014, the Defendants concluded a sales contract to purchase the instant real estate in KRW 3.1 billion from F at the E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

According to the instant sales contract, the Defendants completed the registration of ownership transfer on December 23, 2014 with respect to each of the instant real estate 1/2 shares. D.

At the time of the conclusion of the instant sales contract, the Plaintiff prepared a sales contract, including the current status and legal relationship of the instant real estate, regulations under public law, types of taxes to be borne at the time of acquisition, tax rates, etc., and attached to the instant sales contract. The Plaintiff signed and sealed the “ broker” column of the instant sales contract.

In addition, the plaintiff performed the business of arranging the loan and applying for the business registration of the purchaser of the real estate of this case.

마. 이 사건 매매계약서 제7조에는 “중개업자는 매도인 또는 매수인의 본 계약 불이행에 대하여 책임을 지지 않는다. 또한, 중개수수료는 본 계약체결과 동시에 계약당사자 쌍방이 각각 지불하며, 중개업자의 고의나 과실 없이 본 계약이 무효취소 또는 해제되어도 중개수수료는 지급한다. 공동 중개인 경우에 매도인과 매수인은 자신이 중개 의뢰한 중개업자에게 각각 중개수수료를 지급한다(중개수수료는 거래가액의 _%로 한다).”라고 부동문자로...