beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.24 2017가단11738

임대보증금반환

Text

1. The Defendant: 50,000,000 won to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 29, 2017 to September 2, 2017.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the grounds for the application;

(However, the creditor shall be deemed the plaintiff and the debtor).

Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Service by Public Notice, Absence)

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant on the premise that the plaintiff's claim is no longer a creditor since it transferred the plaintiff's claim against the defendant to the plaintiff's successor intervenor during the proceeding of the lawsuit in this case, and thus, it cannot be accepted.