과징금납부명령취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
A. The chief officer of the department in charge of the business decided 4 tenders, such as R 20, 21 bidding, R Ma 22,22, 23 bidding, Q Ma 17 bidding, R Ma Ma 24 (or Ma24, 25) bid (the pertinent bid is not actually ordered, and the accurate name of the construction is not known) through prior meetings, as indicated in the following Table 6: (a) the chief officer in charge of the business decided that the successful bid will be awarded (or the above agreement in 207).
However, the R Ma24 (or Ma24, 25) tender was not implemented as agreed because it did not place an order.
Examining the contents agreed by 8 companies, including the Plaintiff, etc. at the time of M 205 to 206, as indicated in the following Table 7: R 20,20, 21 bidders, FR Me22, 23 bidding, H Q Q 22, 23 biddingJ, CR Ma24 (or Mere 24, 25) bidding I, and M, the agreement between 8 companies, such as the Plaintiff, etc. at the time of the 2005 to 2006 bid.
The 7th 2005 to 2006 and the order of orders for the 2007-2007-2007-2007-2007-H 3K 4 H 5 J 6C 7 M 8I* : The order of orders is divided. The point line: 4th : The plaintiff et al., who participated in the 2007-2-2007-2-2-2007-2-2007-207-207-207-207-207-207-207-7-206-7-200-7-7-7-200-7-7-200-7-7-20-7-20-7-20-7-20-7-20-7-20-7-20-77-20-77-20-7.
The name of the construction work for which eight preliminary agreements have been made by the plaintiff, etc. in 2009.