취업기간만료자취업활동기간연장불허가처분취소
2011Nu189 Revocation of revocation of refusal to extend the employment activity period for a person whose employment expires.
A
Daejeon Head of Local Employment and Labor Agency
Daejeon District Court Decision 2010Guhap2038 Decided January 12, 2011
May 26, 2011
July 7, 2011
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's rejection of the extension of the employment period for the plaintiff on May 11, 2010 shall be revoked.
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.
The presiding judge, new judge
Judges Cho Young-hoon
Judges Kim Gung-sung