Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A around March 7, 2005, an employee of a specific defendant in the facts charged, committed a violation of the restriction on vehicle operation on the roads prior to the control of Dol-dong Dol-dong Dol-dong Dol-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, on March 7, 2005. 2. The penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review on December 29, 201 are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality (the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24, October 28, 2010; 201Hun-Ga38, October 28, 2010; 2008Hun-Ga17, July 30, 2009). Thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.