If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 60,000 won.

The defendant is an urban bus driver.

The defendant is in a close trial with neighboring residents C, and is in a difficult relationship with each other.

1. At around 01:50 on September 2, 2012, the Defendant, on the ground that he did not properly investigate the fact that a police officer in charge of the E box called out after receiving a report at the four front paths of the D building in Jinju, and reported to the police officer in charge of the E box, who was called out, was stolen by neighboring residents C, and, on the ground that “A police officer, who was called out for the same five minutes as the police officer, and the housing resident, were openly insulting the above F, on the ground that he did not investigate the fact that he was stolen by neighboring residents C.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and time as set forth in the preceding paragraph, expressed that “A victim C (manam, 50 years of age) expressed that “I will not punish the schep, schep, schep, schep, and schep,” and publicly insulting C in front of the police officers dispatched and the victim’s wife and neighbors.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Statement made to F and C by the police;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the statutes governing the arrest of flagrant offenders;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;