When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one may intermediate a third party's communications through the electrical interpretation services provided by a telecommunications business operator, or provide such services for communications of a third party.

Nevertheless, on April 14, 2018, the Defendant heard that he would pay 80,000 won of the prepaid chip from a nameless person who became aware of through the Internet B via the Internet, and sent a photograph prior to the Defendant’s identification card and contract, etc., and had the nameless person open only one cell phone (C and D), and provided telecommunications services provided by the telecommunications business operator for another’s communications purpose.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 97 of the relevant Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 97 and 30 of the Telecommunications Business Act on the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;