A. Status 1) The Plaintiff is the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”).

(2) The Defendant is an insurer that has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with A with respect to the B excavation vehicles owned by A (hereinafter “instant vehicles”) with the insured, which is a special corporation established by the Minister of Labor and entrusted by the Minister of Labor with the industrial accident compensation insurance business.

B. 1) Occurrence of an accident is a construction site E in Sinsi-si D where C was being subcontracted by E.S. Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant construction site”).

In addition, while the F was driving the instant vehicle at around 11:30 on September 22, 201 and moving from the second line to the first line at the construction site, the G, the head of the Working Group C affiliated with C, which was waiting in the atmosphere, was divided into the wheels of the vehicle according to the signals in the access control at the non-destructive inspection site, and the G exceeded the floor in conflict with the instant vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) As a result, G suffered injury on the left-hand upper thrings, the upper thrings, the upper thrings, the upper right-hand strings, the upper strings, the upper strings, the upper strings, the upper strings, the upper strings, the upper strings and tensions, the lower right-hand strings, the upper knee’s salt and tensions, the upper knee’s salt and tension, the upper strings and tensions, and the telecompiles.

C. (1) G received hospitalized treatment from September 22, 201 to February 21, 2012, G, and the Plaintiff paid medical care benefits 20,702,350, temporary layoff benefits 37,068, 370, 376, 77, 980, 9828, 708, 70, 708, 70, 7028, 201, under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act. < Amended by Act No. 11337, Jan. 10, 2012; Act No. 11304, Feb. 22, 2012; Act No. 11306, Aug. 10, 2012; Act No. 11306, Oct. 5, 2012; Act No. 13373, Oct. 22, 2012; Act No. 13094, Jul. 28, 200

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy or Gap evidence 1 to 6 (including each number).