A. The Plaintiff is a corporation established pursuant to the Korea Electric Power Corporation Act, which is an electricity supplier under the Electric Utility Act, and the Defendant A is the owner of C rocketing car (hereinafter “instant car”), and the Defendant B is the wife of the Defendant A.

B. On November 26, 2016, Defendant A, while driving the instant vehicle with Defendant B on board around November 26, 2016, allowed Defendant B to drive the instant vehicle at the request of Defendant B, who had not obtained the driver’s license at the time of Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sanam Agricultural and Industrial Complex.

Accordingly, at around 11:40 on the same day while Defendant B was driving with Defendant A while driving the vehicle on board, Defendant B followed the Plaintiff’s ground reconstruction disuse (hereinafter “the instant ground reconstruction disuse”) installed on the sidewalk jum, which was installed on the sidewalk jum because the instant vehicle failed to operate properly due to the erroneous operation of X-gu and the operation of steering equipment, even though the speed should be reduced by going through bring to maintain the distance with the vehicle at the Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-do.

As a result, the ground remodeling of this case was destroyed and the underground cables were damaged.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On November 29, 2016, the Defendants drafted a memorandum of the payment of damages (hereinafter “each of the instant notes”) with the purport that “the Plaintiff shall compensate for all damages, including the Plaintiff’s restoration cost, design cost supervision cost (the cost of implementation in the outside week or the Han River) incurred from the instant accident, and the amount of damages of the hindered power.”

On December 2016, the Plaintiff completed the instant ground opening and ground cable restoration work through Alger Electricity Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ Alger Electricity”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 5, Gap evidence 10, the video of Gap evidence 10, the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the above fact of recognition of the liability for damages.