beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.11.19 2015고단1390

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On June 4, 1993, around 05:19 on June 4, 1993, the employee A employed by the Defendant 93 high-level3557 violated the restriction on vehicle operation by operating the B truck belonging to the Defendant in excess of the total weight.

B. At around 03:10 on December 23, 1993, the Defendant’s employees C violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle by operating the D freight vehicle belonging to the Defendant in excess of the total weight in the granchisium of the Changwon-gun, Changwon-gun, the Changwon-gun, the Changwon-gun, the Gyeongwon-gun, and the Defendant’s employees.

2. Of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995) which applies to each summary order subject to review, the part concerning a violation under Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the same Act has become retroactively effective due to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality 201Hun-Ga24, Dec. 29, 201, and thus, the Defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.