When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 28, 2015, around 12:20, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main store business by avoiding disturbance for about 20 minutes, such as finding the victim D (V, 48 years old)’s “E main store” in Busan Dong-gu C on the ground that the injured party reported the Defendant as a interference with business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (as to the simultaneous situation of absence);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act involving Costs of Trial;