However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 15:00 on June 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 1 hour and 20 minutes, including the victim D (at 50 years of age) in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and 1; and (b) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by a juncing force over approximately 1 hour and 20 minutes, where the victim scams the victim “the group customer may come off.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection [the scope of the recommended punishment] The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended punishment] The mitigated area (one month to eight months) [the person who has been specially mitigated] [including efforts to recover damage] [the decision of sentence] six months of imprisonment, the suspension of execution two years, the defendant observe the protection has several previous convictions, and there are more favorable circumstances such as confessions and reflects, and there are more favorable circumstances such as agreement with the victim.