[폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반 ][공1990.3.15(868),588]
The case holding that mentmen and bricks constitute dangerous articles under Article 3 (1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act
If the defendant saw the victim above the ground floor and laid down the mentor brick and mentor stone one time, the mentor brick is deemed to constitute a deadly weapon or other dangerous article as stipulated in Article 3(1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act.
Article 3(1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act
Defendant
Defendant
Attorney Lee Young-young
Seoul Criminal Court Decision 89No4940 delivered on October 27, 1989
The appeal is dismissed.
The number of detention days after an appeal shall be included in the calculation of the original sentence.
We examine the grounds of appeal.
As to the Defendant’s ground of appeal
In this case where a defendant was sentenced to less than ten years of imprisonment for an unfair sentencing, it may not be deemed as a legitimate ground for appeal on the ground of unfair sentencing, and it shall also apply to cases where a defendant is allowed to go beyond the period
As to the grounds of appeal by a public defender:
According to the facts acknowledged by the court below, the defendant saw the victim's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's mentor's bla
Therefore, the appeal shall be dismissed, and part of the detention days after the appeal shall be included in the original sentence. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.
Justices Kim Young-ju (Presiding Justice)