However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

1. The Defendants’ special larcenyed thief, who are married couple, and as one of the married couple, stolen an article or stolen one person, while waiting in the manner of parking and viewing a net, and then stolen food.

On August 24, 2019, at around 20:30 on August 24, 2019, the Defendants corrected the part of “victim E” in this part of the facts charged of this part, which is the vice-componsor of D’s starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting starting from Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the victim Co., Ltd., to “E”.

Defendant B included three compacts equivalent to KRW 38,700, which had been displayed in the store, and Defendant A calculated a cash reduction in the calculation unit rather than complying with it. Defendant B used three compacts, which had not been calculated by looking at the eye of the store employees, as it is, from that time until September 12, 2019, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and stolen the total amount of goods owned by the victim seven times from that time by the same method as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

As a result, the defendants stolen the property owned by the victim jointly.

2. 피고인들의 특수절도미수 피고인들은 2019. 9. 17. 19:43경 전항 기재 장소에서, E의 감시가 소홀한 틈을 이용하여 피고인 B는 물건을 고르는 척을 하고, 피고인 A은 7,000원 상당의 마른 오징어 1마리를 들고 바지 주머니에 숨겨 밖으로 나가는 방법으로 절취하려 하였으나 피고인들의 범행을 눈치 챈 매장 직원에게 발각되어 그 뜻을 이루지 못하였다.

As a result, the Defendants jointly attempted to steal the property owned by the victim, but did not commit the attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (investigation of CCTV at the scene of crime);

1. Criminal facts;